While I was in Waterloo, I met a woman who is the minister of a Mennonite congregation in northern Ontario. She told us that their previous minister had been in declining health and she had helped him with his pastoral responsibilities, ensuring that congregation was nurtured when he was unable to do so.
After he left the congregation she was meeting with an area officer of the Mennonite church and they were
discussing the responsibilities she had undertaken and her feelings about what she had been doing. From that conversation flowed a process that led to her being ordained as a minister to that congregation. She did online studies (distance education sure has changed in the past 20 years!) to deepen her education and help her prepare for a broader range of responsibilities and expectations that came with ordination , but she was raised up from within her congregation to be in ministry with that congregation.
She told us that her license specifies that she is ordained to minister to that congregation and only that congregation.
We have a similar process. It used to be the process that produced Lay
Pastoral Ministers (in Training, initially, but when the training was complete, the "in Training" would be removed.) Now we call them designated lay pastoral ministers. Now we call them Designated Lay Ministers and it is unlikely that they will be ministers to the congregations from which they come. They too rise from within the congregation, but more usually, they work with a congregation not their own, and they are unlikely to return to home in a ministerial capacity.
You could even say that that is where commissioned and ordained ministers begin. We are all recommended by our home congregations. Without the blessing and endorsement of our home church we cannot go forward. But unlike those others, one of the requirements, at least to date, is that when we are ordained we go, not back to those who nurtured us, but to wherever the church has need of us. We can have input into that placement, but it is extremely unlikely that we will return to our "home" church. It's this process that has seen our former intern, Cathy, move to Newfoundland as she begins her life as an ordained minister of the United Church of Canada.
But even if we returned "home", our church structure deems that it is no longer our home. Once ordained our membership, our "home congregation" is presbytery. It is there that our membership now rests, not on the Roll of the sponsoring congregation. As I was reflecting on that reality I wondered who would actually choose that to be "home"? Who wants to call home a place where there seems to be
dissension and
fruitless discussion about issues that really don't impact our everyday life? I'm a bit jaded and jaundiced, but it seems to me that we've lost that sense of home which is so important to us.
They say that "home" and "family" are what today's post moderns are seeking. They want a place where they can turn for support and encouragement, which will challenge them when they go astray and celebrate with them when they succeed. They want something that equips them for today's realities and assures them that there is meaning and purpose, and that they can be in a real relationship with God, not simply a theologically correct one. They want a place that invites them into life, and the fulness of life.
If you're curious about what it is they are seeking, ask yourself, "What are the issues in your church today?" Range through all of the issues, both large and small with which we struggle.
Now, ask yourself, "What are the issues that keep you awake at night?" What is it that prompts brooding, or fretting? (And no, we won't beat you with the stick of 'faith' if you admit that you do have the occasional sleepless night!)
As you reflect on your answers to these two questions, ask yourself how many things were on both lists?
It is the general lack of points of interception that prompts the absent generation to remain absent. The questions that keep us awake at night are the questions that they want to see addressed.
"Moderns" main concern was "is it true?" They embraced an organised theology. Clergy were trained to be 'resident theologians'.
"Post Moderns" main concern is "does it work?" To them, if it doesn't work then it doesn't matter if it's true. If we don't reflect the life and teaching of Jesus in how we deal with life everyday, then they see no place for themselves in our midst.
Challenging questions for us to wrestle with, but an enriched life if we dare to embark upon the challenge. They want to see us as disciples, or apprentices, involved not in
changing beliefs, but in changing lives. We have the resources. Do we dare to use them in new ways? Are we ready to become incarnational???? Are we ready to become apprentices? Are we ready to help them find a new family? A new home?
Reading for today: Isaiah 48:1-51:1